Close Menu
thewitness.com.au
  • Home
  • Latest
  • National News
  • International News
  • Sports
  • Business & Economy
  • Politics
  • Technology
  • Entertainment

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

What's Hot

Exclusive Brethren pet ban order sparks fears of global cull in sect, The Plymouth Brethren Christian Church

May 15, 2026

Why Gina Cass-Gottlieb is proving critics wrong in landmark cases against Coles and Qantas

May 15, 2026

VAR is removing the colour and chaos from sport. It’s time for a renaissance

May 15, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Threads
thewitness.com.au
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Subscribe
  • Home
  • Latest
  • National News
  • International News
  • Sports
  • Business & Economy
  • Politics
  • Technology
  • Entertainment
thewitness.com.au
Home»International News»Harvey Weinstein’s third NYC sex crimes trial ends in a mistrial after surprise jury note
International News

Harvey Weinstein’s third NYC sex crimes trial ends in a mistrial after surprise jury note

info@thewitness.com.auBy info@thewitness.com.auMay 15, 2026No Comments4 Mins Read
Harvey Weinstein’s third NYC sex crimes trial ends in a mistrial after surprise jury note
Share
Facebook Twitter Pinterest Threads Bluesky Copy Link


Harvey Weinstein’s third Manhattan sex crimes trial has ended in a mistrial after the jury was unable to unanimously decide whether to convict the ex-Miramax boss of allegedly raping actress Jessica Mann.

Manhattan Supreme Court Judge Curtis Farber declared a mistrial at just after 1pm on Friday, local time— marking it the second time that a panel failed to reach a verdict on Mann’s allegations, The NY Post reports.

For the 74-year-old, it was the third trial he faced over accusations he raped Mann inside the DoubleTree hotel in Midtown on March 18, 2013 — which Mann recounted on the witness stand for five days at the four-week trial.

On Thursday morning, the jury had sent a note saying that they could not reach a unanimous decision — which prompted the judge to issue an Allen charge, instructing the panellists to continue their deliberations.

But the jury then sent another note at the lunch break, saying they couldn’t reach an agreement.

“We feel no one is going to change where they stand,” the note read.

Weinstein’s lawyer Marc Agnifilo then motioned for a mistrial, which was granted by the judge.

Mann, now 40, broke down several times during her painful testimony as she faced off against her abuser for the third time when a jury at last year’s retrial could not convict the ex-powerhouse producer of rape.

“I said, ‘No’ over and over and I tried to leave,” Mann said through sobs, shortly before she demonstrated to jurors how Weinstein allegedly pinned both of her wrists above her head during the sex attack.

Mann had testified that she did have a consensual relationship at one point because she felt it could lead to a “loving relationship” — while also acknowledging she knew about Weinstein’s power in Tinseltown and how it affected her decision to get involved with him.

At every trial, Mann has been consistent with how she’s described Weinstein: an erratic brat who could switch from being a caring person to someone could throw a tantrum if things didn’t go his way.

Weinstein also liked to let people know how “powerful” he was in the film industry and how he could make or break a fledgling actor or filmmaker’s career if he or she crossed him, Mann had testified.

“Essentially, his friends go very far and his enemies don’t step foot in this town,” the cosmetologist and hairstylist said.

Mann said that Weinstein had told her that he was in an “open relationship” with then-wife Georgina Chapman when they decided to start hooking up.

Mann also testified that Weinstein had allegedly raped her at a Los Angeles hotel later in 2013, though Weinstein isn’t charged for that attack.

Weinstein’s lawyer Teny Geragos held Mann on the ropes during a multi-day brutal cross examination when she was pressed repeatedly about her relationship with Weinstein and a so-called love note — written by Mann just two days after the alleged New York City attack — which was introduced for the first time at any trial.

“Do I love him or the idea of him? With him — easy. The idea of expanding that — fulfilling,” Mann mused — two days after she said she was sexually assaulted by Weinstein in a room at the DoubleTree hotel in Manhattan.

Mann testified that she had become “emotionally attached” to someone and wanted a loving romance — but Weinstein’s lawyer noted how there was no mention about having allegedly been raped.

In the prosecution’s closings, Manhattan Assistant District Attorney Nicole Blumberg urged jurors to understand how Weinstein’s power made it easy for him to manipulate people — and Mann, an aspiring actress with big dreams, became a victim.

“She missed the red flags, she missed the manipulation, the power, the control. She rationalised in her own mind the unwanted sex in the beginning,” Blumberg told jurors.

Weinstein’s lawyer Marc Agnifilo tried to poke holes in Mann’s character, bringing up how mentally unstable she was at the time — while also claiming that Mann was lying to jurors while on the witness stand.

Weinstein awaits sentencing on his 2025 conviction when a jury found him guilty of a first-degree criminal sex act for allegedly assaulting Miriam “Mimi” Haley, a former TV production assistant.

This article originally appeared in The NY Post and was reproduced with permission.

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest Bluesky Threads Tumblr Telegram Email
info@thewitness.com.au
  • Website

Related Posts

Exclusive Brethren pet ban order sparks fears of global cull in sect, The Plymouth Brethren Christian Church

May 15, 2026

Why Gina Cass-Gottlieb is proving critics wrong in landmark cases against Coles and Qantas

May 15, 2026

VAR is removing the colour and chaos from sport. It’s time for a renaissance

May 15, 2026
Add A Comment
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Demo
Top Posts

Police believe ‘Penthouse Syndicate’ built Sydney property empire from defrauded millions

September 24, 2025216 Views

Inside the bitter fight for ownership of a popular sports website

October 23, 2025151 Views

Wife of Australian Community Media boss responds to husband’s assault charges

March 15, 2026112 Views
Don't Miss

Exclusive Brethren pet ban order sparks fears of global cull in sect, The Plymouth Brethren Christian Church

By info@thewitness.com.auMay 15, 2026

SaveYou have reached your maximum number of saved items.Remove items from your saved list to…

Why Gina Cass-Gottlieb is proving critics wrong in landmark cases against Coles and Qantas

May 15, 2026

VAR is removing the colour and chaos from sport. It’s time for a renaissance

May 15, 2026

Woman files first court action against disgraced gynaecologist Simon Gordon

May 15, 2026
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
  • TikTok
  • WhatsApp
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
Top Trending
Demo
Most Popular

Police believe ‘Penthouse Syndicate’ built Sydney property empire from defrauded millions

September 24, 2025216 Views

Inside the bitter fight for ownership of a popular sports website

October 23, 2025151 Views

Wife of Australian Community Media boss responds to husband’s assault charges

March 15, 2026112 Views
Our Picks

Exclusive Brethren pet ban order sparks fears of global cull in sect, The Plymouth Brethren Christian Church

May 15, 2026

Why Gina Cass-Gottlieb is proving critics wrong in landmark cases against Coles and Qantas

May 15, 2026

VAR is removing the colour and chaos from sport. It’s time for a renaissance

May 15, 2026

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
  • Home
© 2026 ThemeSphere. Designed by ThemeSphere.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.