President Donald Trump urged a judge to let him continue a $US10 billion ($15.4 billion) libel lawsuit against Rupert Murdoch over a Wall Street Journal article claiming he sent a bawdy birthday note to Jeffrey Epstein, saying the news outlet still hasn’t been able to prove the letter is real.
An identical birthday note handed over to the House Oversight Committee by the Epstein estate does not prove that Trump actually wrote and sent the letter, the president’s lawyer said in a filing urging the court to deny Murdoch and News Corp’s request to dismiss the case.
Rupert Murdoch and News Corp have stood by the accuracy of the story, noting that Trump “acknowledged his friendship with Epstein.”Credit: Reuters/AP
“On the contrary, the defendants’ reliance on a purported letter released over a month after the complaint was filed proves that defendants did not actually possess, or even review, any purported letter before publishing the false and defamatory article,” Alejandro Brito, Trump’s lawyer, said.
News Corp didn’t immediately respond to a message seeking comment on the filing.
Loading
The report, which described a 2003 note containing a sketch of a naked woman that bore Trump’s signature and was compiled with other letters into a “birthday book” for Epstein’s 50th birthday, was published amid a firestorm of criticism over the Trump administration’s handling of documents from the financier’s criminal case.
Trump claimed in his suit that he never wrote the letter and accused News Corp and its chairman emeritus of defaming him. The media giant asked a judge to dismiss the suit last month, arguing that the July 17 article was bolstered when the Epstein estate gave the note to the House committee investigating the deceased financier’s sex-trafficking.
In his suit, the president, who has claimed he cut ties with Epstein nearly two decades ago, accused Murdoch and News Corp of trying to malign his character. Brito said in Monday’s filing that the article was an attempt “to wrongly and inextricably” link Trump to Epstein.
“It is clear that the article intended to subject President Trump to public hatred and ridicule,” the lawyer. “Defendants did not publish the article on the front page of the Wall Street Journal based on a mere harmless joke between friends.”
