The two cases are not identical. Creative Australia unanimously decided to withdraw Sabsabi’s appointment after a question in parliament drew attention to the politics of some of his earlier art, in particular YOU from 2007, a digital work which features images and audio of then Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah. Nasrallah is portrayed wreathed in beams of light, “suggestive of divine illumination”, according to Sydney’s Museum of Contemporary Art.
Loading
Patir never opened her exhibition at the 2024 Biennale. The campaign against “any official representation of the state of Israel on the international cultural stage” did not succeed, but the artist chose to demonstrate her own support for a ceasefire-hostage deal by keeping it visible only in glimpses through windows in the Israeli pavilion. Organisers stated the work “awaits inside for the moment when hearts can once again be open to art”.
While some of Sabsabi’s content has depicted terrorists or terrorism (YOU has Nasrallah, while the previous year’s Thank You Very Much shows the planes flying into the World Trade Centre), Patir’s work, M/otherland, had no connection to the conflict. It was an installation that reimagined fertility goddesses as real-life mothers.
The signatures on the two letters put the lie to the claim that support of Sabsabi is all about artistic censorship. Many people in the arts community and beyond clearly apply a double standard that equates to “no censorship of art unless it’s Israeli”. Jewish creatives in Australia have been the victims of this double standard, too.
Since the Hamas October 7 attack, many have reported feeling threatened by their colleagues’ unlimited support for the Palestinian cause and lack of sympathy for Israeli victims. The doxing of more than 600 members of the Jewish creatives WhatsApp group in February 2024 brought the issue to a head and exposed hundreds of Jewish artists to victimisation, exclusion and bullying. Any connection with Israel – or simply a Jewish name or heritage – has led to creatives being excluded.
Loading
While many Jewish artists are naturally afraid to share their experiences on the record, I know of several shocking cases, including an established artist dropped by a gallery that had represented her for years; a young gallery worker who left her job after being confronted with antisemitic stereotypes; and an emerging artist with a recognisably Jewish family name who went from having several projects a year accepted to having every application rejected since October 7.
It is so dire that sculptor Nina Sanadze has founded Goldstone Gallery for the express purpose of platforming artists cancelled for political reasons, predominantly Jewish and Israeli artists.
Opposing any censorship of art or political interference in artistic processes is a legitimate position. This is the position that I hold, and I don’t think Sabsabi’s appointment should have been retracted. The opposite position – that art is inherently political, and that boycotts are a legitimate technique to advance a political agenda or protect a society – can also be argued, though it is an offence against freedom of expression which rarely delivers change for good.
Deborah Stone is editor-in-chief of The Jewish Independent, where an earlier version of this article was published. Additional research by Kate Lewis and Danny Companez.
