Close Menu
thewitness.com.au
  • Home
  • Latest
  • National News
  • International News
  • Sports
  • Business & Economy
  • Politics
  • Technology
  • Entertainment

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

What's Hot

Labor sends emergency delegation to Asia to address diplomatic concerns

June 14, 2026

The Age and SMH superquiz, Monday, June 15

June 14, 2026

Multimillion-dollar boost to save Great Barrier Reef

June 14, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Threads
thewitness.com.au
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Subscribe
  • Home
  • Latest
  • National News
  • International News
  • Sports
  • Business & Economy
  • Politics
  • Technology
  • Entertainment
thewitness.com.au
Home»Business & Economy»The RBA’s interest rate policy is fuelling Australia’s home affordability crisis
Business & Economy

The RBA’s interest rate policy is fuelling Australia’s home affordability crisis

info@thewitness.com.auBy info@thewitness.com.auOctober 5, 2025No Comments4 Mins Read
The RBA’s interest rate policy is fuelling Australia’s home affordability crisis
Share
Facebook Twitter Pinterest Threads Bluesky Copy Link


In the less than eight months since the Reserve began it latest easing cycle on February 19, average house prices have jumped 5 per cent. Why? FOMO – fear of missing out. We’ve all been trained to know that, as soon as the Reserve starts cutting rates – and thus making it easier to afford a huge loan – many people will start buying places.

Loading

When they do, house prices will start rising. In which case, I’d better buy my place ASAP. And when many other people do the same, demand exceeds supply and prices rise – thus making the expectation self-fulfilling.

Now, if expectations were perfectly symmetrical, this wouldn’t matter. It would be offset when the Reserve made the initial rate rise of a tightening cycle. Demand for homes would suddenly drop because more rises were expected, thus pushing house prices down.

What’s more likely, however, is that house prices are “sticky downwards”. If so, “monetary policy” – the manipulation of interest rates – has a ratchet effect, pushing house prices up but not down. If so, that’s a serious unintended consequence of using interest rates to manage demand.

And I’m indebted to my former understudy, Gareth Hutchens, for noticing some remarks by Stephen Grenville, a former deputy governor of the Reserve, acknowledging another respect in which monetary policy leads to higher house prices. (By the way, please don’t look for Hutchens’ Sunday economics column on the ABC site. You might decide he’s smarter than his former master.)

Grenville said the Reserve had yet to resolve a problem with its use of interest rates to influence increases in the prices of goods and services: this also affects the prices of assets, including property.

The inflation-targeting framework encourages policymakers to keep cutting rates as the inflation rate keeps falling – even if it falls below the target range, as it did for more than a year before the arrival of COVID.

Grenville said an ever-lower interest rate does very little to increase growth in real gross domestic product, but it has a big effect on asset prices such as houses and shares (which are often bought with borrowed money).

He said people need to realise that monetary policy has its limits, and if we keep cutting rates below a certain point it can cause economic problems, especially with property prices.

Oh, dear. What can we do? Well, one simple response would be to abandon the convention that almost all the work in the short-term management of aggregate demand must be left to monetary policy. That is, more of the load should be carried by “fiscal policy” aka the budget.

But the episode we’re just leaving – where we laboured painfully for about three years using monetary policy to end the inflation surge caused by COVID and the response to it – has convinced me we’d be better off ditching monetary policy completely as an instrument for managing the macroeconomy and shift to one with fewer unintended consequences and adverse side effects.

We have at our fingertips a much fairer and more efficient instrument to restrain or encourage demand as required.

We have at our fingertips a much fairer and more efficient instrument to restrain or encourage demand as required.Credit: Dominic Lorrimer

Partly because the interest businesses pay is tax deductable, the effect of higher interest rates is concentrated on the one-third of households with mortgages. They get really squeezed, whereas people who own their homes outright, and even renters, are let off lightly.

This is obviously hugely unfair on home-buyers. We should be using an instrument that spreads the squeeze to a much higher proportion of households. But monetary policy’s narrow application makes it inefficient as well as unfair. Because so few people are directly affected, it takes much longer to work.

And the joke is that, unlike all the other rich economies, and as first suggested by Hutchens, we have at our fingertips a much fairer and more efficient instrument to restrain or encourage demand as required: a temporary increase or reduction in the 12 per cent compulsory superannuation contribution rate.

The Business Briefing newsletter delivers major stories, exclusive coverage and expert opinion. Sign up to get it every weekday morning.

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest Bluesky Threads Tumblr Telegram Email
info@thewitness.com.au
  • Website

Related Posts

Labor sends emergency delegation to Asia to address diplomatic concerns

June 14, 2026

The Age and SMH superquiz, Monday, June 15

June 14, 2026

Multimillion-dollar boost to save Great Barrier Reef

June 14, 2026
Add A Comment
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Demo
Top Posts

Byron Bay psychedelic guru accused of strangling wife Kira-Tara Razam

June 6, 20264,141 Views

NRL Highlights: Cowboys v Dolphins – Round 14

June 6, 2026726 Views

Police believe ‘Penthouse Syndicate’ built Sydney property empire from defrauded millions

September 24, 2025351 Views
Don't Miss

Labor sends emergency delegation to Asia to address diplomatic concerns

By info@thewitness.com.auJune 14, 2026

June 15, 2026 — 12:00amSaveYou have reached your maximum number of saved items.Remove items from…

The Age and SMH superquiz, Monday, June 15

June 14, 2026

Multimillion-dollar boost to save Great Barrier Reef

June 14, 2026

Tigers gun forced off with awkward injury

June 14, 2026
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
  • TikTok
  • WhatsApp
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
Top Trending
Demo
Most Popular

Byron Bay psychedelic guru accused of strangling wife Kira-Tara Razam

June 6, 20264,141 Views

NRL Highlights: Cowboys v Dolphins – Round 14

June 6, 2026726 Views

Police believe ‘Penthouse Syndicate’ built Sydney property empire from defrauded millions

September 24, 2025351 Views
Our Picks

Labor sends emergency delegation to Asia to address diplomatic concerns

June 14, 2026

The Age and SMH superquiz, Monday, June 15

June 14, 2026

Multimillion-dollar boost to save Great Barrier Reef

June 14, 2026

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
  • Home
© 2026 ThemeSphere. Designed by ThemeSphere.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.